CABIER GLOBAL ASSURANCE
Trust Infrastructure Operating System
Trust infrastructure for AI-native institutions and high-consequence systems.
Independent assurance across AI, institutions, financial infrastructure and connected systems, with every decision linked to authority, controls, evidence and institutional resilience.
YOU CHOOSE THE AI. CABIER ORCHESTRATES THE TRUST.
Foundational doctrine · The white paper trilogy
The thinking behind every control on the platform.
Three long-form papers set out how intelligence is separated from authority, how institutions prepare for frontier capability, and how agentic finance stays accountable at the bank perimeter.
One assurance architecture
Intelligence + authority + context + consequence = assurance
Every consequential action is resolved through the same visible chain. The result is a dated, attributable assurance position, not an unexplained score or hidden model judgement.
From obligation to accountable decision
- Obligation
- Control
- Evidence
- Accountable decision
Connected capabilities beneath one assurance architecture.
These are not separate product families. They operate through TrustGraph, AssureAdapt, AssureCore, AssureMark, Sentinel and the Evidence Vault so boards, auditors and supervisors can examine the same attributable position.
What the control plane carries in each context.
Frontiers and industries
Start where your obligation sits
Every path joins the same assurance flow: obligation, control, evidence and accountable decision.
Shared assurance foundation
- Obligation
- Control
- Evidence
- Accountable decision
One architecture. Two deployment contexts.
The four assurance lenses share one operating foundation, then adapt to institutional, enterprise, government and sovereign operating conditions.
Private Sector
Trust Infrastructure for regulated enterprise
The operating layer for banks, insurers, asset managers and digital-asset institutions: supervisory intelligence, AI governance, cyber, operational resilience, tokenisation assurance and continuous evidence in one control plane. Now with Regulatory Packs, Group Assurance, Know Your Agent, agentic control and the Integration Hub.
Government
Trust Infrastructure for sovereign and public bodies
The same operating layer deployed under sovereignty and residency constraints for agencies, authorities, critical-infrastructure operators and defence suppliers: federal, state and local, Canada, and ports and authorities.
One assurance foundation across both contexts
Need to resolve the right assurance context?
Schedule a consultationSee the Platform in Action
Current assurance views for enterprise, government and supervisory workflows, shown across every device.
One connected assurance graph
Obligations, controls, evidence, entities and decisions share one traceable relationship model
Jurisdiction-aware views
The same assurance object resolves into local supervisory and operating requirements
Human authority preserved
CABIER detects, correlates, explains and escalates; accountable people decide consequential action
CABIER sits above the rail, not on it.
Chains settle. Regulators supervise. CABIER assures. Whichever consortium clears the trade and whichever model writes the memo, the same institutional obligations bind the booking institution. The same evidence has to exist.
Assurance layer: CABIER
AssureCore · 8 Trust GatesIssuance integrity
Evidence coverage
Obligation controls
- Mint authority reconciled against board mandate
- Supply ledger tie-out complete for the period
Illustrative obligation readout. Not live client data.
Settlement layer: rails and cohorts
Rail-agnosticLive assurance surfaces.
Each surface below is live on the same operating layer: one obligation model, one evidence vault and one resilience position.
LIVE
Legal Intelligence & Assurance
Law compiled into controls and evidence rather than summarised. Sources, obligations, mapped control domains, evidence requirements and the accountable owner, held on one record.
LIVE
Sustainability Assurance
The 2026 ESRS reset removed datapoints, not liability. Disclosure claims are carried as controls with evidence behind them, including an anti-greenwash control on marketed claims.
LIVE
Assurance testing and libraries
Atomic control tests executed through AssureCore's eight Trust Gates, over an institutional control library, third-party portfolio, model estate and settlement position, all reading one evidence vault.
Watch one obligation run end to end.
Legal, compliance, audit and technology see the same obligation from four seats. Pick a scenario, pick a seat, and watch the loop run. Figures are illustrative of a sample estate.
An agent acts outside its envelope
An AI system that can act must have a named owner, a bounded authority and an intervention path.
Authority in scope: AI rulebooks and model risk expectations across the jurisdictions in scope.
The control that carries it, and who owns it
Synthetic proof
See the assurance state change.
These deterministic, client-side demonstrators expose the facts, relationships, controls, evidence and interventions behind each derived state. They do not reveal hidden model reasoning, predict crises or take consequential action.
Flagship executive walkthrough
One event. Six consequence domains. One assurance fabric.
Follow a synthetic autonomous AI incident through compute containment, tokenised settlement, critical infrastructure, institutional capital and supervision while its evidence and human authority remain intact.
Illustrative
Frontier AI Assurance Demonstrator
Frontier AI Assurance Demonstrator
The same model, assured four different ways.
Change the deployment and the answer changes without the model changing. Change the footprint and the obligations change without the deployment changing. That is the layer that sits above model-level safety work.
Risk band
High
Disposition
Sovereign deployment required
Sovereignty
S2
Trust gate
Cleared with conditions
Intersecting obligations
Pre-deployment evaluation of a high-consequence AI use
Higher standard appliesGroup parent, Canadian subsidiary, UK subsidiary
Human oversight of automated action
Cumulative, one requires local exerciseUsers across forty markets
Cross-border processing for inference
Conflicting with a centralised inference pathResidency-binding regimes in scope
Incident reporting from a single detection event
Cumulative, differing clocks6 regimes
Evidence retention and residency
CumulativeLongest period governs, in-country retention required
Control state
Agent identity and ownership
PassNamed agent, named owner, named business owner, envelope recorded.
Authorisation envelope
ConditionalPer-action limits present; two action paths lack an explicit ceiling.
Tool and MCP governance
ConditionalOne tool server is outside the reviewed inventory.
Data isolation
ConditionalProduction data reachable from a path intended for staging.
Prompt injection resistance
ConditionalUntrusted content reaches a tool-using path; compensating review required.
Human escalation and interruption
ConditionalInterruption capability exists; measured latency exceeds the tolerance for one action class.
Jurisdiction intersection resolved
Conditional6 regimes intersect; two obligations are cumulative and one conflicts.
Residency of data, processing and evidence
ConditionalSovereign configuration required and not yet verified.
Evidence capture
PassEvery decision, refusal and intervention written against the system identity.
Evidence completeness
77%
Evidence residency
In-country requirement engaged
AI Trust Score
66
Model evidence
Partially substantiated
Executive view
Risk band high, 7 conditions outstanding. Disposition: sovereign deployment required. The institution's resilience position moves by -4.2 while these conditions remain open.
Resilience position
-4.2 on the institution's resilience position
Regulator view
6 regimes intersect on this activity. Sovereignty classification S2. Evidence completeness 77%, held subject to an in-country requirement. Every control state above is dated and traceable to authority, obligation, test and evidence.
Required remediation
- Authorisation envelope: condition to be evidenced before the approval expires.
- Tool and MCP governance: condition to be evidenced before the approval expires.
- Data isolation: condition to be evidenced before the approval expires.
- Prompt injection resistance: condition to be evidenced before the approval expires.
- Human escalation and interruption: condition to be evidenced before the approval expires.
- Jurisdiction intersection resolved: condition to be evidenced before the approval expires.
- Residency of data, processing and evidence: condition to be evidenced before the approval expires.
Disruption tray
Assurance is not established once. Inject a change and the position is re-derived, showing what moved rather than presenting a fresh answer.
Illustrative. Model options are neutral capability profiles, not named products, and the reads are derived from published material and a defined assurance profile. Nothing here certifies any model or any provider.
Synthetic system
Systemic Financial Siege Demonstrator
Systemic Financial Siege Demonstrator
Fourteen thousand events, none of them reportable, one pattern.
A defined synthetic ecosystem of eleven participants. Move through the four acts and the pattern assembles from signals that no single institution would escalate.
Fourteen thousand two hundred synthetic events across eleven participants. Every event is individually plausible and every signal sits under its own institution's threshold. Nothing would be reported anywhere.
Events observed
14,200 across payments, identity, access, settlement, liquidity and agent activity.
Institutional alerts raised
None. Each participant sees a normal day inside its own perimeter.
Flow integrity
Within tolerance at every participant assessed individually.
Why this matters
The gap is structural. A threshold set for one institution cannot see a pattern distributed across eleven.
Scenario shelf
Each scenario runs against the same synthetic ecosystem, without disrupting anything. Exposure, propagation, control gaps, the single point of failure and how quickly it moves.
Cabier does not predict financial crises and does not claim to. It identifies emerging deviations, correlations, concentrations and propagation patterns that may indicate systemic stress or coordinated disruption, states its confidence, shows its derivation and escalates to human authority.
Cabier Assurance Corpus
Horizontal ontology and vertical domains, with relationships preserved.
Cabier Assurance Intelligence
Developed and evaluated against the corpus. Model-independent and model-diverse.
Continuous learning, evaluation and reassessment
Governed pipeline, versioned, with human-reviewed outcomes only.
An assurance decision must be capable of being produced through deterministic controls, TrustGraph, the Assurance Corpus, Cabier Assurance Intelligence, independent model evaluation and human authority, rather than requiring any one frontier model. That is the answer to who assures the assurer. Compute may remain in the customer environment while assurance remains independently governed by Cabier.
Research tells you what the law says. Assurance shows you held it.
Legal AI has become very good at finding the text and drafting around it. That is not the examination question. The examination question is which obligation binds this entity, which control discharges it, what evidence exists, who owned it, and what moved when the guidance changed.
Cabier sits above the research and drafting layer. Sources compile into obligations, obligations into controls, controls into evidence, on the same spine that carries resilience, cyber, model risk and tokenisation. Privilege is classified at the record, so what is shareable with a supervisor and what is not is decided before anyone asks.
- 01
Source
The operative text, cited and dated: statute, regulation section, guidance, judgment or executed clause.
- 02
Obligation
What the text requires of this institution, with the applicability test that puts it in or out of scope.
- 03
Control
The control domains that discharge the obligation, mapped into the same spine as every other control.
- 04
Evidence
What must exist to show it held, who owns it, and the exposure if it is not produced on examination.
Whichever rail clears the trade, the same obligations bind the institution.
Networks settle. Custodians hold. Banks issue.
Governance is the institution's own.
Two tokenisation rails are going live. Cohort A covers tokenised securities, in production trading from mid-2026. Cohort B covers bank-issued deposit tokens on shared 24/7 rails, H1 2027. Each carries an L5 governance obligation no rail operator can discharge on the institution's behalf. Cabier is the control plane above both and above every regional rail.
Above both rails, covering tokenised securities and tokenised deposits. Cross-framework ORS, effectiveness-graded controls, immutable calculation lineage, six-obligation coverage, human-led assurance across 6+ jurisdictions.
Membership rules, validator coordination, network-level operating standards inside a single rail.
Asset-level lifecycle primitives: mint, burn, freeze, unfreeze, force transfer, clawback, pause.
Securities-account bookkeeping, settlement participant authorisation, custody segregation under a single home regulator.
Atomic DvP, finality, and the cash leg of securities settlement. Cohort A.
Bank-issued deposit tokens settled 24/7 inside the regulated, insured banking system. Operator-utility neutrality means no participant bank can own governance over a shared rail.
L1 to L4 are operated by the rail itself. L5 is the institution's own obligation and cannot be discharged by any rail operator's home authorisation.
Public briefs state the category map for each cohort. The named comparison and full operating disclosure are released only under non-disclosure agreement.
One control plane. Every regional rail.
The L5 obligation does not change at the border. Anchors do. The US ships the largest institutional volume first, with DTCC on the securities cohort and The Clearing House on the deposits cohort. Canada, Asia, the Caribbean and Africa follow on the same substrate.
We are not in three markets. We are above them.
Buyers usually arrive comparing us to something. Here is the honest read on each.
Legacy GRC suites
Workflow and questionnaire engines. Point-in-time attestation. Multi-quarter implementations.
An operating layer with a live resilience number, continuous control monitoring and evidence graded for effectiveness, not pass/fail.
AI governance point tools
Single-model or single-jurisdiction. Policy documents and checklists. Vendor self-attestation accepted.
Estate-wide oversight across Western, open-weight, sovereign and observed frontier models, under one policy engine and one trust score. Independent by design.
Tokenisation networks
Each is a rail. Assurance stops at the boundary of their own ledger.
Rail-agnostic governance above the rail. Six institutional obligations bind the booking institution whichever consortium clears the trade.
Current analysis and institutional intelligence.
CLARITY Act · Senate Calendar No. 423 House-passed 17 July 2025, awaiting Senate floor time. We plan on the regimes that bind today.
What governs nowThe current institutional record.
Cabier's flagship intelligence on the assurance layer, AI oversight and the regulatory paths that actually govern digital finance today.
Global AI Assurance
Governance became an operating control. How AI oversight moved from static pre-deployment policy to continuous assurance across agents, tools, permissions and evidence.
Interoperable AI Assurance
How requirements become controls, tests, evidence and accountable decisions across existing frameworks.
14 min readAI Code of Conduct Consultation Response
Twelve recommendations on making AI conduct codes verifiable: named evidence, version binding, interruptibility and independent evaluation.
14 min readThe Sovereign AI Operating System
Sovereignty is a control-plane property, not a data centre: gates, jurisdictions and refusal evidence.
19 min readThe AI Oversight Fabric
Independent oversight of AI-driven systems, model-agnostic by design.
12 min readThe Assurance Operating System
Why the next layer of digital finance is not another rail, and what binds the booking institution whichever consortium clears the trade.
14 min readThe Circle and the Filing
Circular financing, the rate channel, and the first audited numbers the market will price against.
9 min readThe control layer is only as good as the people running it.
Every engagement transfers method, not dependency. The academy and the institutional library are how the second and third lines pick the work up and keep it.
Cabier Academy
Training that produces artefacts
Role-based paths from analyst to board, built on the same control spine the platform runs. Lessons end in an artefact, such as a register entry, test result or board paper, not a completion badge.
Institutional library
Digital books and reference sets
Long-form institutional reference on tokenisation assurance, AI governance, operational resilience and supervisory intelligence, read in-platform with citations intact.
Ready for
Infrastructure-Grade Compliance?
Deploy regulated-grade risk infrastructure that scales with your regulatory complexity. Board-ready evidence automation across all operational domains.