ORS · Resilience dimension

    AI and Agentic Resilience

    AI does not deserve its own scorecard beside the institution's resilience position. It belongs inside it. This dimension aggregates fifteen inputs and reports one thing: the effect AI and autonomous systems have had on the institution's ability to keep operating.

    Fifteen inputs

    Input names are published. Weights, thresholds and the grading rubric are institutional methodology and are not.

    01Model dependency
    02Agent autonomy
    03Tool access
    04Data permissions
    05Human oversight
    06Model drift
    07Agent drift
    08Provider concentration
    09Third-party dependency
    10Cyber exposure
    11Incident history
    12Recovery capability
    13Fallback model
    14Evidence freshness
    15Control effectiveness

    What the board receives

    Not this

    AI Governance Score: 82

    A number with no consequence attached. It does not tell the board what changed, or what to do about it.

    This

    AI has moved the institution's resilience position, and here is the dependency that did it

    Traceable to a named control, a named provider and a named owner, with the evidence behind each.

    AI Trust Score ORS liveGlobal AI Assurance